13:04:21 From Holly Wiggins to Everyone: Really enjoyed the two Working Circles I attended today. Thank you Matt for organizing all of this! 13:05:22 From Matthew David to Everyone: The last week of USDA Working Circles are now available. Head here to sign up: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17ry5-PdWi2UjPUk_VAHZv9MtkMCc7Fuu0laltWsKcOU/edit#gid=0 13:05:48 From Matthew David to Everyone: Working Circles are GREAT to use at the initial planning stage for a press release, paper, presentation, etc. 13:09:42 From Matthew David to Everyone: Supporting a hands-on STEM experience. 13:10:00 From Matthew David to Everyone: Not enough student outreach? 13:10:49 From Matthew David to Everyone: Getting more and more proximate. 13:12:07 From Matthew David to Everyone: For your Working Circles, if you ever feel like you're getting stuck, skip to doing the cABT. 13:14:00 From Matthew David to Everyone: Sometimes it helps to just start from the skeleton of the narrative that you want to tell. Hence, use the cABT. 13:15:49 From Matthew David to Everyone: Everyone, feel free to add your own comments to the chat for these ABTs. Your brainstorming notes will be great practice for your Working Circles. 13:16:19 From devo to Everyone: β€œand” in the therefore 13:17:27 From Matthew David to Everyone: The THEREFORE doesn't have a solid WHAT at the beginning. It could use a broad headline statement. 13:18:24 From Matthew David to Everyone: There's a pretty good HEAVEN in the And already. Nice job! 13:19:41 From Matthew David to Everyone: Randy added a simple WHAT at the beginning of the BUT to start with an easy to understand summary. I think of the WHAT as a simple Headline, then after the BECAUSE you can dive into the details. 13:20:27 From Matthew David to Everyone: The THEREFORE could use a simple WHAT at the beginning as well. This is all part of Step 3 on the ABT Blue card. 13:22:30 From Rick Nelson to Everyone: Impending retirement and diversity are two narratives. 13:23:38 From Matthew David to Everyone: Is there a Christmas Tree (singular broad problem) that could fit both the impending retirements and the lack of diversity? 13:23:58 From devo to Everyone: diminished workforce 13:24:17 From devo to Everyone: or inadequate workforce 13:24:23 From Matthew David to Everyone: Devo - I think that's the right track. 13:25:02 From Matthew David to Everyone: BUT we are facing an inadequate workforce BECAUSE of impending retirements and a lack of diversity. 13:27:41 From Matthew David to Everyone: It's a good stakes raising issue that will amplify the problem in the red. 13:28:22 From Matthew David to Everyone: Sometimes what some people think of are problems are actually stakes raising issues that amplify the importance of the core singular problem. 13:28:30 From Matthew David to Everyone: *as problems 13:32:27 From Sujata.Emani to Everyone: everywhere... I am trying to use it everyday... even in family communications. 13:33:06 From Matthew David to Everyone: Reacted to "everywhere... I am t..." with πŸ‘πŸ» 13:33:09 From Sujata.Emani to Everyone: love that.... 13:33:45 From Sujata.Emani to Everyone: I always wondered why the calories I ate from those cookies... was for good. 13:36:46 From Matthew David to Everyone: Yup, Dianna Padilla will be here for Tuesday's class. 13:36:58 From Matthew David to Everyone: Her focus is proposal writing. 13:39:12 From devo to Everyone: this is brilliant!!! 13:41:57 From Sujata.Emani to Everyone: I wonder if the issue with science and fact focused folks is the "amplify." Science is not interested in overstating the problem. Also interwoven issues are the way we demonstrate the "amplify[ing]" of the problem. 13:46:30 From Sujata.Emani to Everyone: So Morpheus.... 13:46:35 From Sujata.Emani to Everyone: Yes... exactly. 13:50:04 From Sujata.Emani to Everyone: Could the sage character be seen as the "conscience? 13:55:24 From devo to Everyone: scientists are people too! 13:55:36 From Sujata.Emani to Everyone: ^... yep 13:56:53 From Diane.Wray-Cahen to Everyone: with regards to overstating the problem, i know some scientists feel constrained by the truth, while some non-scientific anti-xxx activists do not need to be constrained by the truth . . . how do you lead when emotion is stronger from others 13:57:29 From Matthew David to Everyone: Diane, I'll call on you next. 13:58:06 From Sujata.Emani to Everyone: I think the anti-xxx people are acting on both some percentage of data and some percentage of personal feeling. I think it's like indigenous knowledge... just because we haven't yet measured it doesn't mean it's not real. 13:58:45 From Matthew David to Everyone: In the Matt Template, I still want you to use FACTS! Just fill out the parts of the Matt Template with what is true. 13:58:56 From Sujata.Emani to Everyone: I've really appreciated this discussion. It's SUPER HELPFUL! Thanks, Mr. Howell, Matt and Randy.! 13:59:48 From Matthew David to Everyone: May not have time for you Diane....sorry! 14:00:04 From Park Howell to Everyone: Happy to help.