13:06:55 From Anne Mullan to Everyone: not seeing Randy's screen 13:07:08 From Matthew David to Everyone: Anne - I am! 13:07:09 From Kathy Swiney to Everyone: I see it 13:07:21 From Anne Mullan to Everyone: ok will see why my zoom only shows my Randy 13:07:21 From Matthew David to Everyone: If you're just getting a black screen, I'd recommend restarting Zoom. 13:13:16 From Matthew David to Everyone: Notice the But paragraphs dropped in the 1940s. My theory is that during WWII, they didn't bother as much with narrative structure because people were going to read it regardless. 13:13:47 From Blane Bellerud to Everyone: The same set of basic facts can give rise to an enormous number of different narrative 13:15:00 From Curt Whitmire to Everyone: Replying to "Notice the But par..." Interesting theory, Matt. Does anyone know if the federal govt was scrutinizing, and perhaps influencing, content in papers more during WWII in order to drum up support for the war effort abroad? 13:16:34 From Rebecca Thomas to Everyone: Makes you wonder how many buts" paragraphs there were during the McCarthy era too. Was it more important then to not be seen as a dissident? 13:20:09 From Mike Strauss to Everyone: Successful fisheries 13:20:31 From Blane Bellerud to Everyone: knowledge 13:20:40 From Anne Mullan to Everyone: a story of the lamprey ocean mystery 13:20:42 From Kinsey Frick to Everyone: understand lamprey in the ocean 13:23:31 From Beth Phillips - NOAA to Everyone: "lamprey are good, not bad!" 13:23:39 From Mike Strauss to Everyone: Oh, oops...you want them to be good...yep, not about fisheries. 13:23:41 From Kinsey Frick to Everyone: Pacific lamprey are native in the Pacific Northwest and are only parasitic in their marine phase where they generally do not kill their hosts. They get such a bad rap! 13:23:44 From Blane Bellerud to Everyone: Europeans ate lampreys too 13:23:55 From Rebecca Thomas to Everyone: And they are so cute! 13:25:29 From Kinsey Frick to Everyone: reasons we know very little right now: lamprey are not targeted in their own marine fishery so no regular source of information in the ocean for them 13:27:24 From Laurie Weitkamp to Everyone: Here's the video by Columbia River tribes on why lamprey are important. 13:27:26 From Laurie Weitkamp to Everyone: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RIsRfSoCvXA 13:27:32 From Blane Bellerud to Everyone: or operate at empty pool 13:27:39 From Kinsey Frick to Everyone: Reacted to "Here's the video b..." with 👍 13:28:37 From Kinsey Frick to Everyone: argument for dam modification 13:28:43 From Curt Whitmire to Everyone: Reacted to "https://www.youtub..." with 👍 13:28:51 From Mike Strauss to Everyone: We have a thing that's good but it can be bad, too, therefore we need a compromise. 13:29:00 From Blane Bellerud to Everyone: ``````````````balance 13:29:12 From Matthew David to Everyone: Reacted to "``````````````balanc..." with 👍 13:29:56 From Matthew David to Everyone: So now tell us in the blue how great things would look if we hit that optimum. 13:30:20 From Mike Strauss to Everyone: We have something that's good, but too much is bad so we need an optimum. 13:30:28 From Kinsey Frick to Everyone: I like balance better than optimum because from most viewpoints the dam modification "optimum" is not perfect, it is a compromise. 13:31:53 From Mike Strauss to Everyone: Kinsey...Good! THat's the sort of judging that's ultimately needed...look for words that "imply" what you want. Why we call this brainstorming. 13:33:46 From Mike Strauss to Everyone: This sort of reasoning is at the core of conflict resolution. 13:34:31 From Curt Whitmire to Everyone: Reacted to "I like balance bet..." with 👍 13:38:50 From Matthew David to Everyone: We should have time for a Q&A today. Feel free to post any questions for Dianna or hit the Raise Hand button and I'll call on you. 13:45:09 From Anne Mullan to Everyone: IF we try it out on colleagues, arent' they inner circle? 13:45:46 From Kinsey Frick to Everyone: We've been focused on single sentence ABTs. I appreciate Dianna's expansion of the framework to the scale of a proposal. 13:48:25 From Matthew David to Everyone: Colleagues are good enough for a first pass, but eventually yeah, you do want to get some outer circle feedback. 13:48:46 From Laurie Weitkamp to Everyone: Any advice on applying this to manuscripts? 13:48:57 From Matthew David to Everyone: Laurie, I'll call on your first. 13:51:50 From Curt Whitmire to Everyone: Thanks Dr. Padilla. In proposals, I understand we want to be concise, but I also worry about not providing enough detail so reviewers have faith I know what I'm talking about. Any tips with finding the sweet spot in providing the right amount of detail when setting up the agreement part of the proposal ABT? 13:52:33 From Matthew David to Everyone: When I work with a producer on a new script, the first thing we hammer out is the 1 sentence logline (i.e. a movie summary ABT). Only after we're on the same page about the logline will we start diving into a more detailed outline. 13:52:49 From Curt Whitmire to Everyone: Reacted to "When I work with a..." with 👍 13:52:51 From Matthew David to Everyone: Curt, I'll call on you next. 13:53:08 From Curt Whitmire to Everyone: Reacted to "Curt, I'll call on..." with 👍 13:57:23 From Mike Strauss to Everyone: If your narrative is strong and something is missing the reviewers will be confident that they don't really need that answered...but if it's a mess and they are lost then they'll start asking for LOTS of additional facts in an effort to see if they can figure out what you want to tell them. 13:58:50 From Mike Strauss to Everyone: Do teenager snails get tiny little braces? 13:58:57 From Rebecca Thomas to Everyone: Reacted to "Do teenager snails..." with 😂 14:00:34 From Forbes Darby to Everyone: Many thanks! Thanks Dianna! 14:00:36 From Matthew David to Everyone: Great lesson in finding agreement!