10:05:03 From Sydney Garfinkel (She/Her) To Everyone:
	can do tomorrow at 11!
10:12:37 From Matthew David To Everyone:
	Thanks Sydney!  Got you down for it!
10:18:04 From Josh Bishop To Everyone:
	Happy birthday! Wishing you a fat tail distribution
10:18:26 From Matthew David To Everyone:
	Reacted to "Happy birthday! Wish..." with 😂
10:32:50 From Matthew David To Everyone:
	Randy’s blog post on the Narrative Index for those of you who want a deeper dive.:  http://www.scienceneedsstory.com/blog/the-narrative-index/
10:34:03 From Matthew David To Everyone:
	We consider a narrative index of over 10 to be adequate.  Below 10 is...lame..
10:34:23 From Josh Bishop To Everyone:
	Remind us the AF threshold to boring?
10:35:06 From Matthew David To Everyone:
	An AF over 3 we consider boring.  Over 4 we consider deadly levels of boring.
10:36:15 From Josh Bishop To Everyone:
	Reacted to "An AF over 3 we cons..." with 👍
10:36:31 From Matthew David To Everyone:
	The AF is a measure of how well edited a document is.  The NI is a measure of the narrative strength.
10:38:29 From Matthew David To Everyone:
	For science papers, we've started including howevers for calculating the NI because some scientists greatly prefer however over but.  But for broad publications like the New Yorker or Time, you'll hardly ever see a however.
10:42:20 From Matthew David To Everyone:
	COVID Leadership: Trump vs Cuomo - Randy's medpage article:  https://www.medpagetoday.com/publichealthpolicy/healthpolicy/86474
10:42:50 From Matthew David To Everyone:
	Word frequency tool – copy your text into this tool to quickly find the number of Buts and Ands to help you in calculating your And Frequency and Narrative Index:  https://www.browserling.com/tools/word-frequency
10:43:19 From Matthew David To Everyone:
	Here's the narrative metrics ranges slide:  http://storycirclestraining.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/and-frequency-and-narrative-index-scores.png
10:44:15 From Matthew David To Everyone:
	We've found over 1000 words tends to be a decent sample size.  Below 1000 and you should take the results with a grain of salt.
10:45:36 From Matthew David To Everyone:
	I've seen science papers with AFs of 2.5 and high NIs, so I know it's possible!
10:49:29 From Matthew David To Everyone:
	So for today, see if you can make an attempt at the Story of, the 5 word problem and the cABT for this ABT.
10:50:51 From Matthew David To Everyone:
	My take on a cABT:  There's a good thing we need, but it's hard to get, therefore we need to be better at getting it.
10:51:15 From Mike Strauss To Everyone:
	Ultimate goal: Cancer detection
10:51:17 From Josh Bishop To Everyone:
	cervical cancer images need improving
10:51:52 From Mike Strauss To Everyone:
	Proximate goal: Image quality
10:52:17 From Matthew David To Everyone:
	FYI:  Wants vs Needs is the screenwritery way of saying Ultimate goal vs Proximate goal.
10:56:21 From Mike Strauss To Everyone:
	lack of resources
10:59:50 From Josh Bishop To Everyone:
	focus the problem on hardware?
11:01:04 From Josh Bishop To Everyone:
	or refere to variable quality imagery in problem statement?