10:05:38 From Matthew David To Everyone:
	Sign up to participate in Working Circles here:  https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1nmaxeyGKnqRVI8oWEam15Oqkec1BXwYeAVpBcaTyl2Y/edit#gid=0
10:07:04 From Matthew David To Everyone:
	We've started our Working Circles with Emory Medical School this week.  If you can't get enough of Working Circle, you're more than welcome to sign up for some of theirs as well.  Sign up for Emory Working Circles here:  https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17ry5-PdWi2UjPUk_VAHZv9MtkMCc7Fuu0laltWsKcOU/edit#gid=0
10:15:26 From Matthew David To Everyone:
	Anyone want to take a crack at a cABT for this ABT?
10:17:20 From Matthew David To Everyone:
	Randy's TEDMED talk:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERB7ITvabA4
10:18:01 From Matthew David To Everyone:
	My take on a cABT for this version:  There's a good thing we should do, but we don't know the best way to do it, therefore we need to figure out the best way.
10:18:21 From Jamal Yearwood To Everyone:
	delivering health interventions?
10:18:35 From Jamal Yearwood To Everyone:
	and then who should do it / who gets paid?
10:18:51 From Josh Bishop To Everyone:
	we know its good, but we don't know how to do it, so we need to gather more evidence
10:20:29 From Matthew David To Everyone:
	Josh, good job putting a Weknowthis in your cABT!
10:20:51 From Josh Bishop To Everyone:
	lol, that's my scientific spirit animal (like Pikachu!)
10:22:56 From Josh Bishop To Everyone:
	After the THEN comes the performance and retention impacts?
10:23:46 From Mike Strauss To Everyone:
	Think of after then you're telling us the "ideal world"...all the good that will happen.
10:23:55 From Matthew David To Everyone:
	If you take a look at MLK's "I Have a Dream" speech, he did an amazing job with the blue material.  Every time he started a sentence with "I have a dream..." he lays down a specific that shows us how good the future could be.
10:25:58 From Sydney Garfinkel (She/Her) To Everyone:
	Reacted to "lol, that's my scien..." with 😂
10:26:04 From Sydney Garfinkel (She/Her) To Everyone:
	Reacted to "After the THEN comes..." with 👍
10:30:57 From Matthew David To Everyone:
	Dobzhansky Template:  Nothing in _______ makes sense except in the light of __________.
10:33:04 From Bernhard ("Bear-n-hard") Weigl, pronouns he, him To Everyone:
	How do you get reviewers to actually look at the proposal as opposed to taking shortcuts - like looking at the list of PIs and co-PIs, and see if you know any of them or their work, or google them or their cv's? I guess the answer is have a catchy abstract in the ABT format...anything else?
10:33:37 From Matthew David To Everyone:
	Good questions Bernhard!  We'll have time for a Q&A today.  I'll call on you so you can ask it.
10:33:54 From Matthew David To Everyone:
	Nm!  You're on now!
10:40:19 From SpencerGaring To Everyone:
	How do you deal with niche fields where the academic space might have different narratives and goals than the private world or situation on the ground?
10:42:22 From Mike Strauss To Everyone:
	The ABT is a way to connect the academic to the real world...it's what the blue is about...there the academic must tell the private why they should care.
10:44:47 From Matthew David To Everyone:
	Yes, a catchy title plays into the Arouse and Fulfill dynamic.  Arouse their interest, then fulfill it with the full details.
10:45:28 From Matthew David To Everyone:
	The Arouse generally is interesting, intriguing, but lacks context.  It buys you just enough time from the audience to start laying out your context in your blue material.
10:46:33 From Matthew David To Everyone:
	Arouse and Fulfill is used in Hollywood all the time.  In the first episode of a series, the first Arouse scene is often flashy, crazy, and full of drama...but you have no context!  You don't know what going on!  The purpose of the Arouse scene is to show you where you're going in the long run.
10:46:57 From Matthew David To Everyone:
	Then, after the flashy Arouse scene, the first episode often goes back in time to the Fulfill to setup the story.
10:52:12 From Mike Strauss To Everyone:
	Weknowdis: the theory, then And if we can do X or find out Y, then (here is how it will impact the practical world).
10:53:08 From Bernhard ("Bear-n-hard") Weigl, pronouns he, him To Everyone:
	I think Spencer's question is about the different motivations regarding global health-related research - academics often prioritize perfect knowledge vs impact people (foundations, governments) prioritize cost-effective reductions in disease), and how do you bridge the divide between them in narratives that concern both groups?
10:53:20 From SpencerGaring To Everyone:
	That's what I'm talking about Bernhard
10:53:52 From SpencerGaring To Everyone:
	Its hard to integrate narratives and get alignment
10:55:04 From SpencerGaring To Everyone:
	Reacted to "I think Spencer's qu..." with 👍
10:55:58 From Mike Strauss To Everyone:
	Spencer/Bernhard: Are you asking how to produce a narrative that speaks to both sides equally? This comes down to the singular narrative. The narrative you write for academics may be different from the one you write for foundations/governments. This is a great question. There isn't a "one size fits all" narrative.
11:01:49 From SpencerGaring To Everyone:
	worms are terrifying!!